Numero 3/2024

Lähteet

Hänninen J., Stenbäck P. & Voima R.: Kun synnytys yllättää – Kokemuksia moniammatillisesta simulaatioharjoituksesta sairaalan ulkopuolisissa synnytyksissä

Hänninen, J. (2026). Väitöskirja asiantuntijuuden ja toimintajärjestelmien kehittämisestä suunnittelemattomiin sairaalan ulkopuolisiin synnytyksiin. in press.

 

Lehtimäki K., Kukko S-K, Metsävainio T., Hakala M. ja Junnilainen S.: VAS on välittämistä – Synnytyskokemusarvion mittaaminen HoiVerKe -organisaatioissa

Aune I, Marit Torvik H, Selboe ST, Skogås AK, Persen J, Dahlberg U. Promoting a normal birth and a positive birth experience – Norwegian women’s perspectives. Midwifery. 2015 Jul;31(7):721-7. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.03.016. Epub 2015 Apr 9. PMID: 25907004.

Callister L.C. Making meaning: Women’s birth narratives (2004) JOGNN – Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 33 (4), pp. 508 – 518. DOI: 10.1177/0884217504266898

Grundström H, Malmquist A, Nieminen K. Factors related to a positive childbirth experience – a cross-sectional study. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2024 Apr 10:1-13. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2024.2336141. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38597181.

Hildingsson, Ingegerd & Johansson, Margareta & Karlström, Annika & Fenwick Jennifer. 2013. Factors Associated with a Positive Birth Experience: An Exploration of Swedish Women´s Experiences. International Journal of Childbirth. vol 3 (3). Doi I:10.1891/2156-5287.3.3.153

Hildingsson, Ingegerd & Karlström, Annika & Larsson, Birgitta. 2020. Childbirth experience in women participating in a continuity of midwifery care project. Woman and Birth. Vol 34 (3) 255-261.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.04.010

Hochman N, Galper A, Stanger V, et al. Risk factors for a negative birth experience using the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2023; 163: 904-910. doi:10.1002/ijgo.14884

HoiVerKe. Hoitotyön kansallinen vertaiskehittämisen verkosto. www.hoiverke.fi

Holopainen A., Stramrood C., Van Pampus M.G., Hollander M., Schuengel C. Subsequent childbirth after previous traumatic birth experience: Women’s choices and evaluations (2020) British Journal of Midwifery, 28 (8), pp. 488 – 496

Holopainen A, Verhage ML, Oosterman M. Childbirth Experience Associated With Maternal and Paternal Stress During the First Year, but Not Child Attachment. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 8;11:562394. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.562394. PMID: 33132933; PMCID: PMC7504903.

Karlström, A., Nystedt, A. & Hildingsson, I. The meaning of a very positive birth experience: focus groups discussions with women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 15, 251 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0683-0

Leinweber J, Fontein-Kuipers Y, Karlsdottir SI, Ekström-Bergström A, Nilsson C, Stramrood C, Thomson G. Developing a woman-centered, inclusive definition of positive childbirth experiences: A discussion paper. Birth. 2023 Jun;50(2):362-383. doi: 10.1111/birt.12666. Epub 2022 Jul 5. PMID: 35790019.

Johansson C., Finnbogadóttir H. First-time mothers’ satisfaction with their birth experience – a cross-sectional study (2019) Midwifery, 79, art. no. 102540. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102540

Joensuu J.M., Saarijärvi H., Rouhe H., Gissler M., Ulander V.-M., Heinonen S., Torkki P., Mikkola T.S. Maternal childbirth experience and induction of labour in each mode of delivery: a retrospective seven-year cohort study of 95,051 parturients in Finland. (2022) BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22 (1), art. no. 508. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04830-9

WHO 2018. Labour care guide User´s manual. 9789241550215-eng.pdf (who.int) 

Joensuu J. Factors behind the childbirth experience: influence on future reproduction. 2023.  Dissetation thesis. Helsingin yliopisto. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/564370

Ulmanen Tuire. 2015. VAS ja traumaattinen synnytys. Löytääkö matala VAS-arvio synnytyksen jälkeisen trauman? Yamk opinnäytetyö. Hämeen ammattikorkeakoulu. 

Yilmaz, NNK1; Kiliç, M2. The Relationship of the Traumatic Birth Perception of Women with Birth Memories and Recall. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice 27(4):p 424-429, April 2024. | DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_163_23

Waldenström, U., Hildingsson, I., Rubertsson, C. and Rådestad, I. (2004), A Negative Birth Experience: Prevalence and Risk Factors in a National Sample. Birth, 31: 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.0270.x

 

Kosonen R-M., Manninen S-M.: Lantionpohjan anatomian vahva tunteminen helpottaa ompelua – Millainen on sinun osaamisesi synnytysvaurioiden korjaamisessa?

 Bäck L, Hildingsson I, Sjöqvist C & Karlström A 2016. Developing competence and confidence in midwifery focus groups with Swedish midwives. Woman and Birth vol.30(1), e32-e38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2016.08.004 

Cronin R, Li M, Culliney K, Maude R & Nelson K 2018. Midwifery management of second-degree perineal tears in New Zealand: A cross-sectional survey of practice. Women and Birth, vol 31, p 422-429. 

Díaz E, Rodríguez-Almagro J, Picón Rodríguez R, Martínez Galiano JM, Martínez Rodríguez S, Hernández-Martínez A 2024. Midwives’ approach to the prevention and repair of obstetric perineal trauma in Spain. Nurs Open. Apr;11(4):e2160. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2160. Erratum in: Nurs Open. 2024 Jun;11(6):e2209. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2209. PMID: 38660722; PMCID: PMC11043828. 

Hammond A, Priddis H, Ormsby S & Dahlen HG 2022. Improving women’s experiences of perineal suturing: A pragmatic qualitative analysis of what is helpful and harmful. Women and Birth.Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages e598-e606. 

Hunter C & Bick D 2019. Early career-midwives’ experiences of perineal assessment and repair after normal vaginal birth. British Journal of Midwivery, Vol 28(1). https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2019.27.1.43 

ICM 2024. Essential Competencies for Midwifery Practice. The Hague: International Confederation of Midwives; 2024. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. 

Kalis V, Stephan Jr, Novotny Z, Chaloupka P, Kralickova M & Rokyta Z 2008. Material and type of suturing of perineal muscles used in episiotomy repair in Europe. Pelviperinoeology, Vol 27(1), 17-21. 

Kettle C, Dowswell T, Ismail KM. Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tears 2010. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010(6):CD000006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000006.pub2. PMID: 20556745; PMCID: PMC7263442. 

Kettle C, Dowswell T, Ismail KM. Continuous and interrupted suturing techniques for repair of episiotomy or second-degree tears. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD000947. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000947.pub3. PMID: 23152204; PMCID: PMC7045987. 

Laine, K., Yli, B. M., Cole, V., Schwarz, C., Kwee, A., Ayres-de-Campos, D., … Dadak, C. (2021). European guidelines on perinatal care- Peripartum care Episiotomy. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 35(25), 8797–8802. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.2005022 

Lee N, Hawley G, Morris J & Kearney L 2024. Perineal repair performed by midwives in Australia: A cross-sectional survey study of education and practice. Women and Birth, vol 37, p 153-158. 

Lindberg I, Persson M, Nilsson M, Uustal E & Lindqvist M 2020.“Taken by surprise” – Women’s experiences of the first eight weeks after a second degree perineal tear at childbirth. Midwifery, Volume 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102748. 

MacLellan J,Gould J & Lewis-Tulett S 2021. Midwifery assessment of the perineum after childbirth: An exploration of competence and confidence. Practising Midwife, vol 24, 27-31. 

Martínez-Galiano, J.M., Arredondo-López, B., Hidalgo-Ruiz, M. et al. Suture type used for perineal injury repair and sexual function: a randomised controlled trial. Sci Rep 10, 10553 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67659-2 

Moy RL, Waldman B, Hein DW 1992. A review of sutures and suturing techniques. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. Sep;18(9):785-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1992.tb03036.x. PMID: 1512311, 

NHS Wales 2018. Guideline for Management and Repair of Perineal Trauma. Saatavina: https://wisdom.nhs.wales/health-board-guidelines/swansea-bay-maternity-file/repair-of-perineal-trauma-maternity-guidelines/ 

Rose J & Tuma F 2023. Sutures and Needels. National library of Medicine. Luettavissa: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539891/ 

THL 2024. Perinataalitilasto – synnyttäjät, synnytykset ja vastasyntyneet 2023: Yli viidennes synnytyksistä päätyy keisarileikkaukseen. Tilastoraportti, SVT: 50/2024. Luettu 28.3.2025. Saatavissa: https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2024110489042

Wilson A 2012. Effectiveness of an educational programme in perineal repair for midwives. Midwifery vol 28, 236-246. 

 

Niela-Vilen, H.: Mitä tutkimusnäyttö kertoo kotisynnytysten turvallisuudesta?

Olsen O, Clausen JA. Planned hospital birth compared with planned home birth for pregnant women at low risk of complications. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2023, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD000352. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000352.pub3

Reitsma A, Simioni J, Brunton G, Kaufman K, Hutton EK. Maternal outcomes and birth interventions among women who begin labour intending to give birth at home compared to women of low obstetrical risk who intend to give birth in hospital: A systematic review and meta-analyses eClinicalMedicine 2020;21, 100319

 

Ruohonen, S. & Niela-Vilen: Synnyttäjien kokemuksia synnytyksen käynnistyksestä

Adler K., Rahkonen L. & Kruit H. (2020) Maternal childbirth experience in induced and spontaneous labour measured in a visual analog scale and the factors influencing it; a two-year cohort study. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth 20(1), 1–7.

Dupont C., Blanc-Petitjean P., Cortet M., Gaucher L., Salomé M., Carbonne B. & Ray CL. (2020) Dissatisfaction of women with induction of labour according to parity: Results of a population-based cohort study. Midwifery 84, N.PAG-N.PAG.

Gatward H, Simpson M, Woodhart L, & Stainton MC (2010) Women’s experiences of being induced for post-date pregnancy. Women & Birth 23(1), 3–9.

Heikkilä K., Räisänen S., Lyyra M. & Parisod H. (2019) Minkälaisia kokemuksia naiset kuvaavat liittyvän traumaattiseen synnytykseen, näyttövinkki 9/2019.

Heino A., Kiuru S. & Gissler M. (2021) Perinataalitilasto synnyttäjät, synnytykset ja vastasyntyneet 2021.

Heli S. & Svensson L. (2017) Trygg förlossning, en omvårdnadsmodell för minskad stress och rädsla (första upplagan). Gothia Fortbildning AB, Stockholm.

Henderson J. & Redshaw M. (2013) Women’s experience of induction of labor: a mixed methods study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 92(10), 1159–1167.

Hildingsson I., Karlström A. & Nystedt A. (2011) Women’s experiences of induction of labour–findings from a Swedish regional study. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 51(2), 151–157.

Jalovaara M. & Fasang A. (2017) From never partnered to serial cohabitors: Union trajectories to childlessness. Demographic Research 36(55), 1703–1720.

Jay A., Thomas H. & Brooks F. (2018) In labor or in limbo? The experiences of women undergoing induction of labor in hospital: Findings of a qualitative study. Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care 45(1), 64–70.

Joensuu J., Saarijärvi H., Rouhe H., Gissler M., Ulander V-M., Heinonen S. & Mikkola T. (2021) Maternal childbirth experience and time of delivery: a retrospective 7-year cohort study of 105 847 parturients in Finland. BMJ Open 11(6), e046433.

Klemetti R. & Hakulinen-Viitanen T. (2013) Äitiysneuvolaopas. Suosituksia äitiysneuvolatoimintaan. Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos, Tampere.

Korhonen A., Jylhä V., Korhonen T. & Holopainen A. (2018) Näyttöön perustuva toiminta : tarpeesta tuloksiin. Skhole, Helsinki.

Kruit , H , Nuutila , M & Rahkonen, L. (2016) Synnytyksen käynnistäminen, kun raskaus on täysiaikainen. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/230048/SLL252016_1845.pdf?sequence=1 (9.2.2023).

Lou S., Carstensen K., Hvidman L., Jensen TF., Neumann L., Habben J-G. & Uldbjerg N. (2021) ”I guess baby was just too comfy in there…”: A qualitative study of women’s experiences of elective late-term induction of labour. Women & Birth 34(3), 242–249.

Lou, S., Hvidman, L., Uldbjerg, N., Neumann, L., Jensen, T. F., Haben, J.-G., & Carstensen, K. (2019). Women’s experiences of postterm induction of labor: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 46(3), 400–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12412

Lundgren I., Blix E., Gottfreòsdóttir H., Wikberg A. & Aagaard Nøhr E. (2022) Theories and perspectives for midwifery – a nordic view (1. p.). Studentlitteratur, Lund.

Moore JE., Low LK., Titler MG., Dalton VK. & Sampselle CM. (2014) Moving toward patient-centered care: Women’s decisions, perceptions, and experiences of the induction of labor process. Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) 41(2), 138–146.

Mäkelä T., Airo R. & Tokola M. (2021) Traumaattisesta synnytyksestä toipuminen. Duodecim 137(1), 72–8.

Nilvér H., Lundgren I., Elden H. & Dencker A. (2022) Women’s lived experiences of induction of labour in late- and post-term pregnancy within the Swedish post-term induction study – a phenomenological study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being 17(1), 2056958.

Nilvér H., Wessberg A., Dencker A., Hagberg H., Wennerholm U-B., Fadl H., Wesström J., Sengpiel V., Lundgren I., Bergh C., Wikström A-K., Saltvedt S. & Elden H. (2021) Women’s childbirth experiences in the Swedish Post-term Induction Study (SWEPIS): a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. BMJ Open 11(4), e042340.

Place K., Kruit H. & Rahkonen L. (2022) Comparison of primiparous womenʼs childbirth experience in labor induction with cervical ripening by balloon catheter or oral misoprostol – a prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 101(10), 1153–1162.

Place K., Rahkonen L., Verho-Reischl N., Adler K., Heinonen S. & Kruit H. (2022) Childbirth experience in induced labor: A prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) with a focus on the first birth. PloS One 17(10), e0274949.

Schaal NK., Fehm T., Albert J., Heil M., Pedersen A., Fleisch M. & Hepp P. (2019) Comparing birth experience and birth outcome of vaginal births between induced and spontaneous onset of labour: a prospective study. Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics 300(1), 41–47.

Schwarz C., Gross MM., Heusser P. & Berger B. (2016) Women’s perceptions of induction of labour outcomes: Results of an online-survey in Germany. Midwifery 35, 3–10.

Sorsa T., Lehtonen N. & Rotkirch A. (2023) Perhebarometri 2023 – Kuka haluaa lapsia 2020-luvulla?. Väestöliitto ry, Väestöntutkimuslaitos.

Tapanainen J., Heikinheimo O., Mäkikallio K. & Aaltonen R. (2019) Naistentaudit ja synnytykset (6. päivitys.). Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.

Toivonen E., Uotila J., Huhtala H. & Palo. (2021) CEQ-FI – validoitu työkalu synnytyskokemuksen mittaamiseen. lääkärilehti 76(11).

Vääräsmäki M. & Raudaskoski T. (2017, 4):345-52) Raskaus ja synnytys keisarileikkauksen jälkeen.

WHO. (Toim.) (2022) WHO recommendations on induction of labour, at or beyond term. World Health Organization, Geneva.

 

Österberg, T. Wikberg, A.: Upplevelserna från lärarutbrytet stärkte viljan attutveckla världen

Bastola, K., Koponen, P., Gissler, M. & Kinnunen, T.I. (2020). Differences in caesarean delivery and neonatal outcomes among women of migrant origin in Finland: A population‐based study. Pediatric and perinatal Epidemiology 34:12–20. DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12611

Malin, M., & Gissler, M. (2009). Maternal care and birth outcomes among ethnic minority women in Finland. BMC Public Health, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi-org.ezproxy.novia.fi/10.1186/1471-2458-9-84

Gissler (Personlig kommunikation 2023)